Friday, April 11, 2014

Technology Lag: We Don't Have Time

From Shauna Hermel's Twitter feed, I came across this article about David Buchanan's talk at the 2013 BIF Research Symposium and Convention. Buchanan said,
There is a sizable investment being made in agricultural research, which should result in new technologies, but it takes time for development and adoption, and then for the benefits to be realized. Historically, it takes about 30 years. We don’t have 30 years.
I also see technology adoption as a major shortcoming of the beef industry. This will be a continued theme of this blog and my extension program.

But, in this post I want to discuss the unresolved concern raised in Troy Smith's article. He quotes Buchanan as saying, "“We’ve done pretty well, but we could do better. But better selection tools just get us into trouble faster if we aren’t selecting for the right things.”

Yet, the article does not suggest what are the "right things". In your experience and based on scientific information, what are the right things?

Please leave your thoughts in the comment section below.
(I have turned off word verification, so it should be easier to comment on the blog. If spam gets out of control, I'll have to turn word verification back on.)

After you have left a comment, click on the button below to see my thoughts.



Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Use Genomics to Maximize Dairy-Beef Crossbreeding

In the March-April 2014 issue of Best of the West, there is an article about producing beef cattle by breeding dairy cows to beef bulls. At the Midwest American Society of Animal Science meetings in Des Moines, Iowa, Kent Anderson of Zoetis discussed this practice and how genomics plays a part in selecting the animals used in these crosses. A dairy producer can use a genomic prediction test, such as Zoetis' CLARIFIDE®, to rank the cows in their herd. The producer can breed the top portion of their cows to dairy sires to produce replacement heifers. The use of sexed semen increases the efficiency of this strategy, as ~90% of these matings result in heifer pregnancies. Then the producer can breed the bottom portion of the cows to a beef sire to produce calves that will be marketed as beef feeder cattle. It is important to select beef bulls that excel at rib eye area and yield grade, as these are the main weaknesses of dairy steers. Research is underway to develop genomic EPDs for feed efficiency, another weakness of dairy steers, so that beef bulls with superior feed efficiency can be used in dairy-beef crosses.

Dairy cattle make up 20% of the beef production in the United States. By using available technologies, dairy producers can increase their income and provide the type of cattle feedlots and packers need to market.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Ancient African Cattle First Domesticated in Middle East, MU Study Reveals
New genetic history of cattle allows for better breeding methods, reveals new aspects of human history

From PLOS Genetics doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004254.g005
Story Contact:
Nathan Hurst, hurstn@missouri.edu, 573-882-6217
COLUMBIA, Mo. – Geneticist and anthropologists previously suspected that ancient Africans domesticated cattle native to the African continent nearly 10,000 years ago. Now, a team of University of Missouri researchers has completed the genetic history of 134 cattle breeds from around the world. In the process of completing this history, they found that ancient domesticated African cattle originated in the “Fertile Crescent,” a region that covered modern day Iraq, Jordan, Syria and Israel.
Lead researcher Jared Decker, an assistant professor of animal science in the MU College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, says the genetics of these African cattle breeds are similar to those of cattle first domesticated in the Middle East nearly 10,000 years ago, proving that those cattle were brought to Africa as farmers migrated south. Those cattle then interbred with wild cattle, or aurochs, which were native to the region, and changed their genetic makeup enough to confuse geneticists.
In their study published in PLOS Genetics, Decker and a team of international researchers compared the similarities and differences among the genetics of many different cattle breeds to determine how the breeds are related. Their research found mixing of native cattle in Indonesia with imports from India, European and African cattle in Italy and Spain, and European and Asian cattle in Korea and Japan.  The MU researchers also determined that unique American cattle breeds, such as Texas longhorns, are the result of breeding between Spanish cattle, transported from Europe by explorers in the 16th century, and breeds of Zebu, or Brahman cattle from India imported into the U.S. from Brazil in the late 1800s. Decker says these discoveries help advance genetics and uncover important information about human history.
“In many ways, the history of cattle genetics mirrors human history,” Decker said. “In the case of African cattle, anthropologists and geneticists used to suspect that domesticated African cattle were native to the continent, when in fact, they were brought by migrating peoples thousands of years ago. By better understanding the history of the animals we domesticate, we can better understand ourselves.”
Decker also said that cattle breeding is important for animal farmers looking to maximize their herds’ meat and dairy production. He says that understanding the genetic history of cattle breeds is important when looking for solutions to agricultural issues.
“Now that we have this more complete genetic history of cattle worldwide, we can better understand the diversity of the species,” Decker said. “By understanding the variations present, we can improve cattle for agricultural purposes, whether that is through breeding more disease-resistant animals or finding ways to increase dairy or beef production.”
A complete copy of  the MU study can be found online at: http://www.plosgenetics.org/doi/pgen.1004254
From PLOS Genetics doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004254.g005

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Adapting Breeding Practices to Genomic Technologies

Reporting on the RAAA Brain Trust 2014: Genomics are building blocks for the future; seedstock producers are the architects, Sheyna Strommen discusses the recent Red Angus seminar held in Denver, Colorado. The Brain Trust is the Red Angus Association's educational forum.
Bob Weaber, a professor at Kansas State and state cow-calf extension specialist, discussed how genomic technologies, such as genomic-enhanced EPDs, are now a useful tool for breeding cattle. The article by Strommen quotes Weaber:
“The purpose of genomics is not to make one bull’s EPDs go up and another’s go down,” Weaber explained. “The real purpose is to enhance the EPD accuracies of the bulls and females tested.“

“If we think about collecting data in traditional genetic evaluation systems to produce EPDs, predictive power takes a lot of data and a lot of time,” Weaber acknowledged. “We have the advantage in genomic data to make selection decisions when cattle are really young.”

This may allow seedstock producers to do a better job determining which bulls go in the sale pen and which bulls become steers.

According to Weaber, genomic technology has come so far that seedstock producers should be moving from marker-assisted marketing to marker-assisted, genomically enhanced selection.

“Think about the bull sale catalogs and communication you see from various producers. If we only test four or five bulls in the offering, have we affected selection? Have we affected what genetics are going out into the world?”

Weaber says, “No.” The genetics haven’t been affected because all of the bulls in the offering will be purchased by someone for use in their herds. “They’re all going to go breed cows somewhere. We have to adopt a methodology of testing a lot more animals.”
Weaber is spot on in his assessment. To get the full effect of genomic-enhanced EPDs, we as beef breeders will need to change our breeding practices.

The genetic change per year is a function of the accuracy of selection, the fraction of animals selected (intensity), and the average age of parents when the calves are born (generation interval).

One of the practices that Weaber highlighted was testing more animals and making selection and culling decisions based on testing an entire calf crop. When we only test the top 5% of  a calf crop, we miss out on the re-ranking that occurs with genomic testing. Due to the random sampling of genes that happens when an animal inherits DNA from its sire and dam, a calf can be superior to the better of its two parents or inferior to the worse of the two parents. Genomic testing identifies the random sample of genes an animal inherited and more accurately ranks the animals. So, that bull we thought was in the top 5% may be average and that bull we thought was average may be in the top 5%. By testing all of the animals in a calf crop we are improving the accuracy of selection.

Weaber also highlighted that we can decrease the fraction of animals selected by using genomics to select bulls that go into the sale pen and bulls that become steers. While rebuilding the cow herd, genomics will also allow us to select which heifers become replacements and which heifers are sold at market. With today's calf prices, selling as many animals as feeders is desirable.

Genomics can also help us to decrease the generation interval by allowing us to use younger sires and donor dams with more confidence.

To get the most bang for the buck and accomplish their goals, beef producers will have to adapt their breeding practices to the new genomic technologies.

Monday, February 24, 2014

Yon Family Farms Use Genomic Test to Deliver More Predictable Seedstock


Kevin and Lydia Yon describe their motivation for using genomic-enhanced EPDs in a recent segment on The Angus Report. Listening to their comments, one gets the sense that a good reputation from a reliable product is important to their operation. To provide reliable information to their commercial bull buyers they have collected various forms of performance data, from weights to ultrasound data. They value the increase accuracy of genomic-enhanced EPDs and feel that they can be more confident in the bulls they place with customers.

The approach Yon Family Farms is just one of many applications and benefits of genomic-enhanced EPDs. Genomic-enhanced EPDs can also be used to increase rate of genetic progress, select for an optimum, decrease the generation interval, put more intensity on the selection of females, or select for difficult to measure traits.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Building Better Genetics


Jimmy Goode is a seedstock producer who understands the potential of genomics. I'm glad to see he was highlighted on The Angus Report. He points out that genomic testing improves accuracy for the EPDs of young animals. Goode also highlights that genomic predictions are applicable in large and small operations.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

New Prices for Limousin Genetic Tests Announced

The North American Limousin Foundation announced new prices for genetic testing. Of particular note, is the new price for genomic-enhanced EPDs coming in at $60 or $55 if bundled with another test. As the price of genomic-enhanced EPDs continues to decrease, it becomes more attractive for producers to test larger numbers of animals.

Other reminders:
DNA Results are sent to NALF from the lab every Thursday,  results are then processed in the NALF system and available to members on Fridays.
NALF only registers ET calves off of the DNA test request form. Any natural calves must be submitted on a natural calf registration application.
February 15th is the deadline to submit data to be included in the next genetic evaluation (calculation of EPDs).